Skip to main content

क्या कोई व्यक्ति पहले से शादीशुदा हैं तो क्या वह दूसरी शादी धर्म बदल कर कर सकता है?If a person is already married, can he change his religion and marry again?

Bilkis Bano case



Bilkis Bano, a survivor of the 2002 Gujarat riots in India, faced brutal violence, including the rape of multiple family members. In 2008, the Supreme Court of India directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to reinvestigate her case. In 2017, the Bombay High Court upheld the life imprisonment of 11 individuals convicted in connection with the case. 

                The court also criticized the state government for its handling of the investigation. Bilkis Bano's case brought attention to issues of communal violence and the need for justice for victims.


Bilkis Bano, a survivor of the 2002 Gujarat riots in India, faced brutal violence, including the rape of multiple family members. In 2008, the Supreme Court of India directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to reinvestigate her case. In 2017, the Bombay High Court upheld the life imprisonment of 11 individuals convicted in connection with the case. The court also criticized the state government for its handling of the investigation. Bilkis Bano's case brought attention to issues of communal violence and the need for justice for victims.


                              Bilkis Bano's case is a tragic episode stemming from the 2002 Gujarat riots in India. Bilkis, along with her family, faced horrific violence during the riots, including the gang rape of her family members and the loss of several family members. The initial investigations into the case were marred by allegations of negligence and a lack of proper inquiry.

        In 2008, the Supreme Court of India intervened, directing the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to reopen and thoroughly investigate the case. The CBI's reinvestigation led to the identification and prosecution of individuals involved in the heinous crimes against Bilkis Bano and her family.

                  In 2017, the Bombay High Court affirmed the life imprisonment sentences for 11 individuals convicted in connection with the case. The court not only focused on delivering justice but also criticized the Gujarat state government for its handling of the investigation, highlighting concerns about the initial inquiry's integrity.

                   Bilkis Bano's case became a symbol of the larger issues surrounding communal violence, human rights violations, and the pursuit of justice in the aftermath of such tragic events. The legal proceedings aimed to provide accountability and reparation for the victims, emphasizing the importance of a fair and thorough judicial process in addressing such sensitive and complex matters.


Bilkis Bano, a survivor of the 2002 Gujarat riots in India, faced brutal violence, including the rape of multiple family members. In 2008, the Supreme Court of India directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to reinvestigate her case. In 2017, the Bombay High Court upheld the life imprisonment of 11 individuals convicted in connection with the case. The court also criticized the state government for its handling of the investigation. Bilkis Bano's case brought attention to issues of communal violence and the need for justice for victims.

Bilkis Bano's case is a tragic episode stemming from the 2002 Gujarat riots in India. Bilkis, along with her family, faced horrific violence during the riots, including the gang rape of her family members and the loss of several family members. The initial investigations into the case were marred by allegations of negligence and a lack of proper inquiry.

In 2008, the Supreme Court of India intervened, directing the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to reopen and thoroughly investigate the case. The CBI's reinvestigation led to the identification and prosecution of individuals involved in the heinous crimes against Bilkis Bano and her family.

In 2017, the Bombay High Court affirmed the life imprisonment sentences for 11 individuals convicted in connection with the case. The court not only focused on delivering justice but also criticized the Gujarat state government for its handling of the investigation, highlighting concerns about the initial inquiry's integrity.

Bilkis Bano's case became a symbol of the larger issues surrounding communal violence, human rights violations, and the pursuit of justice in the aftermath of such tragic events. The legal proceedings aimed to provide accountability and reparation for the victims, emphasizing the importance of a fair and thorough judicial process in addressing such sensitive and complex matters.

Bilkis Bano's ordeal began during the 2002 Gujarat riots, a period marked by widespread communal violence. In the midst of the chaos, Bilkis and her family faced unimaginable horrors, including the gang rape of several female family members and the brutal killing of close relatives. The initial investigations into these atrocities were widely criticized for negligence, lack of diligence, and potential complicity on the part of law enforcement.

The turning point came in 2008 when the Supreme Court of India took cognizance of the case and directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to conduct a fresh and thorough investigation. The CBI's reinvestigation aimed to uncover the truth, identify the perpetrators, and ensure justice for Bilkis and her family.

The subsequent legal proceedings brought to light the harrowing details of the crimes committed against Bilkis Bano and her kin. The accused individuals were prosecuted, and in 2017, the Bombay High Court upheld the life imprisonment sentences for 11 individuals found guilty in connection with the case. This legal victory not only sought to deliver justice to Bilkis but also exposed the inadequacies and lapses in the initial state-led investigation.

The Bombay High Court, in its judgment, not only focused on the criminal accountability of the accused but also criticized the Gujarat state government for its handling of the case. The court's remarks underscored the importance of a fair and impartial investigative process, highlighting systemic issues that needed attention.

Bilkis Bano's case transcendence its legal dimensions and became a symbol of the broader challenges related to communal violence, human rights abuses, and the pursuit of justice in the aftermath of such traumatic events. It served as a call for accountability, emphasizing the need for a robust legal framework and diligent law enforcement to address and rectify the aftermath of communal violence.


Bilkis Bano, a survivor of the 2002 Gujarat riots in India, faced brutal violence, including the rape of multiple family members. In 2008, the Supreme Court of India directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to reinvestigate her case. In 2017, the Bombay High Court upheld the life imprisonment of 11 individuals convicted in connection with the case. The court also criticized the state government for its handling of the investigation. Bilkis Bano's case brought attention to issues of communal violence and the need for justice for victims.


Bilkis Bano's case is a tragic episode stemming from the 2002 Gujarat riots in India. Bilkis, along with her family, faced horrific violence during the riots, including the gang rape of her family members and the loss of several family members. The initial investigations into the case were marred by allegations of negligence and a lack of proper inquiry.

In 2008, the Supreme Court of India intervened, directing the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to reopen and thoroughly investigate the case. The CBI's reinvestigation led to the identification and prosecution of individuals involved in the heinous crimes against Bilkis Bano and her family.

In 2017, the Bombay High Court affirmed the life imprisonment sentences for 11 individuals convicted in connection with the case. The court not only focused on delivering justice but also criticized the Gujarat state government for its handling of the investigation, highlighting concerns about the initial inquiry's integrity.

Bilkis Bano's case became a symbol of the larger issues surrounding communal violence, human rights violations, and the pursuit of justice in the aftermath of such tragic events. The legal proceedings aimed to provide accountability and reparation for the victims, emphasizing the importance of a fair and thorough judicial process in addressing such sensitive and complex matters.

Bilkis Bano's ordeal began during the 2002 Gujarat riots, a period marked by widespread communal violence. In the midst of the chaos, Bilkis and her family faced unimaginable horrors, including the gang rape of several female family members and the brutal killing of close relatives. The initial investigations into these atrocities were widely criticized for negligence, lack of diligence, and potential complicity on the part of law enforcement.

The turning point came in 2008 when the Supreme Court of India took cognizance of the case and directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to conduct a fresh and thorough investigation. The CBI's reinvestigation aimed to uncover the truth, identify the perpetrators, and ensure justice for Bilkis and her family.

The subsequent legal proceedings brought to light the harrowing details of the crimes committed against Bilkis Bano and her kin. The accused individuals were prosecuted, and in 2017, the Bombay High Court upheld the life imprisonment sentences for 11 individuals found guilty in connection with the case. This legal victory not only sought to deliver justice to Bilkis but also exposed the inadequacies and lapses in the initial state-led investigation.

The Bombay High Court, in its judgment, not only focused on the criminal accountability of the accused but also criticized the Gujarat state government for its handling of the case. The court's remarks underscored the importance of a fair and impartial investigative process, highlighting systemic issues that needed attention.

                                                                         Bilkis Bano's case transcended its legal dimensions and became a symbol of the broader challenges related to communal violence, human rights abuses, and the pursuit of justice in the aftermath of such traumatic events. It served as a call for accountability, emphasizing the need for a robust legal framework and diligent law enforcement to address and rectify the aftermath of communal violence.

Bilkis bano judgement 


The judgment in Bilkis Bano's case was delivered by the Bombay High Court in 2017. The court upheld the conviction of 11 individuals who were found guilty in connection with the heinous crimes committed against Bilkis Bano and her family during the 2002 Gujarat riots. Below are key points from the judgment:

Convictions Upheld: The Bombay High Court affirmed the life imprisonment sentences of the 11 accused individuals. These convictions were based on charges related to rape, murder, and other crimes committed during the Gujarat riots.

Critical Assessment of the State's Role: The judgment criticized the Gujarat state government for its handling of the initial investigation into the case. The court highlighted lapses, negligence, and potential complicity on the part of law enforcement officials during the earlier stages of the inquiry.

Compensation and Rehabilitation: In addition to the criminal convictions, the court emphasized the need for compensation and rehabilitation for Bilkis Bano and other survivors. This aspect underscored the broader implications of the case beyond criminal justice, recognizing the need for support and redressal for the victims.

Human Rights and Communal Harmony: The judgment emphasized the significance of protecting human rights and fostering communal harmony. It underscored the responsibility of the state to ensure the safety and security of all its citizens, irrespective of their religious or ethnic background.

Deterrence and Justice: The court's decision aimed not only at serving justice in the specific case but also at acting as a deterrent against future instances of communal violence. It stressed the importance of holding individuals accountable for their actions to prevent impunity.

Legal Precedence: Bilkis Bano's case set a legal precedent by addressing the inadequacies in the initial investigation and ensuring that the perpetrators faced appropriate legal consequences. The judgment highlighted the role of the judiciary in rectifying lapses in the criminal justice system.

Public Awareness: The case garnered significant public attention and served as a focal point for discussions on issues related to communal violence, human rights, and the judicial process. It brought to light the challenges faced by survivors of such atrocities and the importance of a fair and transparent legal system.

International Recognition: Bilkis Bano's case also received international attention, drawing focus on human rights concerns and the need for accountability in cases of mass violence. The judgment reflected India's commitment to addressing such issues within its legal framework.

In essence, the Bombay High Court's judgment in Bilkis Bano's case was a comprehensive legal response that not only delivered justice to the victims but also highlighted systemic flaws and the importance of safeguarding human rights in the face of communal violence. The case stands as a testament to the role of the judiciary in upholding the rule of law and ensuring accountability for egregious crimes.



All 11 convicts in the Bilkis Bano case surrendered late Sunday night at Godhra sub jail in Gujarat's Panchmahal district in keeping with the deadline imposed by the Supreme Court.

All 11 convicts have surrendered before jail authorities late Sunday night. They reached jail before midnight of January 21, which was the deadline set for them to surrender," local Crime Branch inspector NL Desai said as reported by news agency PTI.

Earlier, SC had refused to extend the time to surrender and had asked them to do so by Sunday. The convicts had sought an extension of time due to 'ill health', 'harvest of winter crops', and 'son's marriage', as reported by Bar and Bench.

        On 8 January, SC had quashed the Gujarat government's decision, taken in August 2022, to prematurely release 11 convicts facing life terms. It ordered all the convicts, who were released prematurely on Independence Day in 2022, back to jail within two weeks.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

मेहर क्या होती है? यह कितने प्रकार की होती है. मेहर का भुगतान न किये जाने पर पत्नी को क्या अधिकार प्राप्त है?What is mercy? How many types are there? What are the rights of the wife if dowry is not paid?

मेहर ( Dowry ) - ' मेहर ' वह धनराशि है जो एक मुस्लिम पत्नी अपने पति से विवाह के प्रतिफलस्वरूप पाने की अधिकारिणी है । मुस्लिम समाज में मेहर की प्रथा इस्लाम पूर्व से चली आ रही है । इस्लाम पूर्व अरब - समाज में स्त्री - पुरुष के बीच कई प्रकार के यौन सम्बन्ध प्रचलित थे । ‘ बीना ढंग ' के विवाह में पुरुष - स्त्री के घर जाया करता था किन्तु उसे अपने घर नहीं लाता था । वह स्त्री उसको ' सदीक ' अर्थात् सखी ( Girl friend ) कही जाती थी और ऐसी स्त्री को पुरुष द्वारा जो उपहार दिया जाता था वह ' सदका ' कहा जाता था किन्तु ' बाल विवाह ' में यह उपहार पत्नी के माता - पिता को कन्या के वियोग में प्रतिकार के रूप में दिया जाता था तथा इसे ' मेहर ' कहते थे । वास्तव में मुस्लिम विवाह में मेहर वह धनराशि है जो पति - पत्नी को इसलिए देता है कि उसे पत्नी के शरीर के उपभोग का एकाधिकार प्राप्त हो जाये मेहर निःसन्देह पत्नी के शरीर का पति द्वारा अकेले उपभोग का प्रतिकूल स्वरूप समझा जाता है तथापि पत्नी के प्रति सम्मान का प्रतीक मुस्लिम विधि द्वारा आरोपित पति के ऊपर यह एक दायित्व है

वाद -पत्र क्या होता है ? वाद पत्र कितने प्रकार के होते हैं ।(what do you understand by a plaint? Defines its essential elements .)

वाद -पत्र किसी दावे का बयान होता है जो वादी द्वारा लिखित रूप से संबंधित न्यायालय में पेश किया जाता है जिसमें वह अपने वाद कारण और समस्त आवश्यक बातों का विवरण देता है ।  यह वादी के दावे का ऐसा कथन होता है जिसके आधार पर वह न्यायालय से अनुतोष(Relief ) की माँग करता है ।   प्रत्येक वाद का प्रारम्भ वाद - पत्र के न्यायालय में दाखिल करने से होता है तथा यह वाद सर्वप्रथम अभिवचन ( Pleading ) होता है । वाद - पत्र के निम्नलिखित तीन मुख्य भाग होते हैं ,  भाग 1 -    वाद- पत्र का शीर्षक और पक्षों के नाम ( Heading and Names of th parties ) ;  भाग 2-      वाद - पत्र का शरीर ( Body of Plaint ) ;  भाग 3 –    दावा किया गया अनुतोष ( Relief Claimed ) ।  भाग 1 -  वाद - पत्र का शीर्षक और नाम ( Heading and Names of the Plaint ) वाद - पत्र का सबसे मुख्य भाग उसका शीर्षक होता है जिसके अन्तर्गत उस न्यायालय का नाम दिया जाता है जिसमें वह वाद दायर किया जाता है ; जैसे- " न्यायालय सिविल जज , (जिला) । " यह पहली लाइन में ही लिखा जाता है । वाद - पत्र में न्यायालय के पीठासीन अधिकारी का नाम लिखना आवश्यक

अंतर्राष्ट्रीय विधि तथा राष्ट्रीय विधि क्या होती है? विवेचना कीजिए.( what is the relation between National and international law?)

अंतर्राष्ट्रीय विधि को उचित प्रकार से समझने के लिए अंतर्राष्ट्रीय विधि तथा राष्ट्रीय विधि के संबंध को जानना अति आवश्यक है ।बहुधा यह कहा जाता है कि राज्य विधि राज्य के भीतर व्यक्तियों के आचरण को नियंत्रित करती है, जबकि अंतर्राष्ट्रीय विधि राष्ट्र के संबंध को नियंत्रित करती है। आधुनिक युग में अंतरराष्ट्रीय विधि का यथेष्ट विकास हो जाने के कारण अब यह कहना उचित नहीं है कि अंतर्राष्ट्रीय विधि केवल राज्यों के परस्पर संबंधों को नियंत्रित करती है। वास्तव में अंतर्राष्ट्रीय विधि अंतरराष्ट्रीय समुदाय के सदस्यों के संबंधों को नियंत्रित करती है। यह न केवल राज्य वरन्  अंतरराष्ट्रीय संस्थाओं, व्यक्तियों तथा कुछ अन्य राज्य इकाइयों पर भी लागू होती है। राष्ट्रीय विधि तथा अंतर्राष्ट्रीय विधि के बीच घनिष्ठ संबंध हैं। दोनों प्रणालियों के संबंध का प्रश्न आधुनिक अंतरराष्ट्रीय विधि में और भी महत्वपूर्ण हो गया है क्योंकि व्यक्तियों के मामले जो राष्ट्रीय न्यायालयों के सम्मुख आते हैं वे भी अंतर्राष्ट्रीय विधि के विषय हो गए हैं तथा इनका वृहत्तर  भाग प्रत्यक्षतः व्यक्तियों के क्रियाकलापों से भी संबंधित हो गया है।